Peter Schäfer wrote: > Schildberg, Steffen wrote: > >> Hmm, yes. I guess you tried to insert an empty value at the last >> position, right? That is your data looked like this? >> 11802;Spalte2;Spalte3;Spalte4;Spalte5;Spalte6;??;Spalte8;; > > > I'm sorry, no, my test data was exactly as i wrote: > > 11802;Spalte2;Spalte3;Spalte4;Spalte5;Spalte6;??;Spalte8; > > I.e. column 9 was missing :). I'll do further > experimenting with the line-end...
It works with: 11802;Spalte2;Spalte3;Spalte4;Spalte5;Spalte6;??;Spalte8;Spalte9; So, i think, it is the bug you described. I'll work around it. Thanks a lot! Best regards, Peter -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
