On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 04:01:51 +1200, Richard Barrington wrote: >Mark, > >My understanding is that "#define min(..." is a macro, and therefore a >preprocessor thing, and it doesn't understand namespaces :-( > >I guess the solution, if we want this to compile on gcc-3.2, is to >rename the macro to something else. xmin?
Not the right solution. When compiling c++ using gcc3.2 and the associated include-files (STL ??), we should not have a min() macro. The templated functions take care of it, hence the macro is not needed. /per regards, Per Jessen, Zurich http://www.enidan.com - home of the J1 serial console. Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped. _______________________________________________ sapdb.general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general
