In article <OF5417750D.0235602B-ONC1256C5C.007FCEF7- [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > > Andrej, > > I just tired FrontBase that tries really hard to be SQL-92 compliant:
The point is not that this is not SQL-92, the point is that is making it very hard to port existing code. De-facto standards should be recognised. > > Personally I only dislike // but at least there is no confusion for a > script that creates multiple procedures / triggers , the rest is acceptable > for me. Everything is acceptable to me, I can live even with //, but it makes porting really difficult. > >SAP DB has terrible ROI in my case - it costs more to port to so- > >called "Free" SAP DB then to buy most of commercial databases. > > Hey, don't exaggerate - when have you last checked the prices for this db > league? Few weeks ago - If I don't finish my work within a week, it would cost us less if we just both 1 CPU licenses for Oracle. > >Sad part is that it would take only a week or two to change this. > > Theoretically you could create a patch... I'll definitely look at that > --- > > Last but not least. What is your porting effort? Maybe we could help. PostNuke CMS (www.postnuke.com) -- Yours, Andrej Falout, http://www.falout.com/disclaimer.html Visit the OpenSource alternative, Aubit 4gl: http://aubit4gl.sourceforge.net PLEASE NOTE: All HTML email sent to me WILL BE DELETED AUTOMATICALLY WITHOUT READING. _______________________________________________ sapdb.general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general
