I managed to get the database started by stopping some other applications
on the box (thus freeing up memory).
When I did start SAPDB, I noticed that the paging space usage didn't
budge. It does look as though SAPDB is using just physical RAM (I didn't
think this was possible under UNIX).
Can someone confirm whether or not SAPDB does run this way, where it
needs a certain amount of physical RAM and that paging space isn't
usable.
Derek
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:03:54 -0500, "Derek M. A. Lee-Wo"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I found the following in a knldiag log file:
>
> 2003-06-25 18:46:53 15 ERR 11332 MEMORY 1207:'ven88c.c' malloc for
> 123965440 bytes failed, Not enough space
> 2003-06-25 18:46:53 15 ERR 11088 TASKING Insufficient memory for
> stacks, Not enough space
>
> I guess that must be the cause. This is a system has 256MB of physical
> RAM and 1000MB of paging space. The paging space is 41% used. I
> certainly have the 123MB it is trying to malloc(). Could SAPDB be trying
> to get this from physical RAM. That's only reason I can think of why
> there isn't sufficient space.
--
Derek M. A. Lee-Wo
Email: (Home) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Those who will not risk cannot win" - John Paul Jones
_______________________________________________
sapdb.general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general
