Yves, you are truly a life saver!  I started my project using
postgreSQL, and transferred it toSAPdb because of PostgreSQL's issues
with boolean variables.  I was tearing my hair out at the thought that
there ware similar problems with SAPdb.

Once again, thank you!  I was imagining all sorts of nasty
workarounds...  :-)

Regards

Alan Graham

and if you're ever in Perth, Oz, the beer's on me!


On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 22:39, Yves Trudeau wrote:
> Hi,
>       you have to use:        SELECT name FROM customer WHERE inactive=cbool(False)
> 
> Good luck
> 
> Yves
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alan Graham
> Sent: 20 juillet, 2003 10:04
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Access97 via ODBC, boolean query
> 
> 
> I've got a query of the form
> SELECT name FROM customer WHERE inactive=False
> in Access 97.  This worked fine in Access, and works in the SQL studio
> to SAPdb (Version 7.4.3).  From Access to SAPdb using ODBC, I get 
> Error 8006 Data types must be compatible.
> 
> The SQL trace of the ODBC driver shows that the boolean test is being
> passed through as '... "INACTIVE" = 0'.  This suggests that it's an ODBC
> problem.  Similarly, inactive <> true is passed through as NOT INACTIVE
> = 1.
> 
> I'm using version 7.4 of the ODBC driver, with the 7.3 version of the
> driver, to avoid the Unicode bug with the ODBC driver (Ie, that 7.4 only
> supports Unicode, win98 doesn't support Unicode, and 7.3 doesn't work
> with MS Access).  I've tried both INTERNAL and ANSI modes of the ODBC
> driver, with the same result, ie, False is transfered as '0' and True as
> 1.
> 
> I've googled for this, and found a few people with the same problem, but
> no answers that work for me.  I got excited about the answer that
> suggested that Access doesn't like nulls in Boolean fileds, but I don't
> have any nulls.  All tuples have the values TRUE or FALSE.  Then I found
> the suggestion that Access wasn't recognising the column as a type
> 'Yes/no'.  I checked that, and it is.  The column is handled correctly
> on forms, etc, as a checkbox where appropriate.  It only seems to be a
> problem in the where clause.
> 
> Can anyone shed any light on this?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Alan Graham
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sapdb.general mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general
> 

_______________________________________________
sapdb.general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general

Reply via email to