> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von:  Schildberg, Steffen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet am:  Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 15:34
> An:   Mailingliste SAPDB (E-Mail)
> Betreff:      RE: Bug in loadercli ???
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> "H�bschen, Peter" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Subject: Bug in loadercli ???
> >     
> > I'm using SAPDB 7.4.3.25 on a Redhat 9 box and I'm stumbled 
> > into a strange
> > problem. So I don't know if this is a bug or I did something wrong.
> > Here is my situation:
> > My commandfile for loadercli is very simple (I'm using it for test
> > purposes):
> > dataextract for dataload  table tbl_staffelteil
> >         outfile 'Anfrage2.control'
> >         outfile 'Anfrage2.data'
> > 
> > I'm starting the loadercli through
> > loadercli -d <mydb> -u pehu,<password> -b <commandfile>.
> > 
> 
> <snipped strange and real table definition>
> 
> > After I found this strange behaviour I looked again and found 
> > out that user
> > pehu (member of usergroup ALLUSERS and <> DBA) has a table called
> > TBL_STAFFELTEIL and that my DBA-Account has such a table 
> > (it's an older
> > version with a different primary key). So loadercli is going 
> > to mix them
> > together. Since I don't know if this is the desired execution from
> > loadercli, I can't say it's a bug. But I would prefer, if I 
> > have access to 2
> > tables with identical names and I want to export them through 
> > the loader,
> > that I get an error like 'The tablename <X> is ambiguous. 
> > Please use the
> > complete name' or something like that.
> > 
> This can't be the desired behavior, can it? But I need another day to
> reproduce it here (if ever ;-) ) because the newest development version
> doesn't show this behavior.
> In the meanwhile would you mind to check if your loader system table
> TRANSFORMATIONMODEL is empty and if not delete all rows? That doesn't
> any harm to your db! After that could you run again the DATAEXTRACT
> statement and see if you get the same result? And of course I would
> be really interested in the result.
> 
> Thx and sorry for any inconvenience.
> Regards,
>  Steffen
> -- 
> Steffen Schildberg
> SAP DB Team
> SAP Labs Berlin
> _______________________________________________
> sapdb.general mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general
> 
Hello, 

I had 9 rows in TRANSFORMATIONMODEL, so I've deleted them and made the same
test. But it happend again. Maybe I'm going to test the latest Version
(7.4.3.27) in the next days.

Peter


_______________________________________________
sapdb.general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general

Reply via email to