On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:30 PM, chris winn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for fixing it. Wouldn't that be a reason to argue for you to > create a branch in order to keep the trunk stable? Usually, I maintain stability for smaller additions like adding a new payment module by simply running the test suite. It passed before I committed, somehow, but it missed that error. For what it's worth, I really don't like the overhead and annoyance of branching with Subversion. Unless it is going to be a larger project, I usually don't do it. Git has spoiled me. > Baring that method of development should I go back to a suggested > stable revision of django & satchmo? > > Or is the suggested method to just run off the trunk for both of those > projects? > We're on track to release 0.8 very very soon now. At that point, we'll ask "regular users" to use that one instead of trunk. In the meantime, there are going to be some occasional bobbles. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
