kbochert wrote: > It seems to me that this kind of thing is easily translated to Django > templates, quicker to type, easier to read, and infinitely extendable. > The syntax and names should be recognizable to a Python/Django/Html > user. > This seems like a good idea, and it'd be easily implemented as a "template rendering engine." I'd suggest posting to a different list (Django-users maybe) to get more eyeballs on it.
I think it'd work well, and it's definitely easy to parse. It has the feel of something similar to docutils, but it's closely tied to an html document tree structure while Docutils tries to abstract the format, and represent document elements as a tree. I'd be willing to say that your idea is very good. It potentially could become a total replacement for the way an html document is stored, but it's an unrealistic possibility in practice. This is because you're proposing what some might call "a solution without a problem." Most people don't mind html, and the ones that do would rather use a GUI html editor. Your idea is still good, but I don't think it'd be something I'd switch to even if it was a finished, turn-key product. I could be wrong, and this could be the next laser. You never know. Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
