FWIW, I agree too. Python 2.4+ sounds reasonable for now. -Chris
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Bruce Kroeze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm floating the question to the satchmo user community. Does anyone here > actually need the python 2.3 compatibility we've been maintaining? > Django is considering dropping support for 2.3 as of Django 1.1 release, > and I'd certainly like to follow suite. Generators, built-in sets, > decorator syntax, and most importantly, forward compatibility with 2.6 & 3.0 > are all going to be much easier if we drop the compatibility code. > > So, anyone use it? Why? Did you know that Python.org doesn't even release > security updates for it any more and that it is therefore a bad idea to run > your store which handles payment information on it? Could you update to 2.4 > or preferably 2.5 if you needed to or are you actually stuck with it for > some good reason? > > -- > Bruce Kroeze > http://gosatchmo.com > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
