BitBucket, of course! I knew I was forgetting one. I think they appear to have the cleanest, simplest, and easy-looking interface of all the options.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Nathan Ekstrom <[email protected]>wrote: > http://bitbucket.org/ does the same thing as github except for mercurial. > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Bob Waycott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd love to. >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Chris Moffitt <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Bob - Good point about site branding. I would like to freshen up the page >>> and maybe even the demo store to be a little more current. Unfortunately, my >>> design-fu is lacking. Are there any talented folks on the list that would >>> like to help out with some redesigned logos and site layout? >>> >>> -Chris >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Bob Waycott <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I think anything of the distributed vcs variety will be found to be a >>>> wonderful upgrade from SVN. >>>> I mostly use git these days. Ccoming from SVN, I have plenty of tales to >>>> tell of how my butt has been saved by the likes of git's branch, rebase, >>>> pull, push, stash, revert, and other handy commands (git-merge-octopus, >>>> anyone?). >>>> >>>> Git has a lot of history behind it and a number of handy utilities and >>>> helper apps abound (like GitX for Mac). >>>> >>>> However, I know that hg & bzr are out there, too, and I won't even >>>> attempt to make any disparaging remarks. I've read enough of both to think >>>> that maintaining a project with them would still be a sufficient >>>> improvement >>>> from SVN. >>>> >>>> I think the choice of project management is perhaps more important than >>>> the tool that manages the code. So, the big contenders there that I'm aware >>>> of are continuing with Trac (which has a git plugin & hg plugin), or going >>>> the routes of something like github, assembla, or launchpad. >>>> >>>> They all have their strengths, I think. Perhaps there is value in askin >>>> how Satchmo plans to continue with regards to its project image. I think >>>> Satchmo could use a bit of branding work. If Satchmo's code was moved over >>>> to a service like those mentioned above, it could provide an opportunity to >>>> break satchmoproject.com away from being limited by Trac integration >>>> and a bit more freedom to take a stab at defining a brand for Satchmo and >>>> redesigning the project's site to focus on the project itself, docs, and >>>> other material that is relevant. Code can be limited to a download link for >>>> a tar or something, as well as one that points people over to the repo on a >>>> hosted service. >>>> >>>> Either way, +(the answer to life the universe and everything times >>>> number of horns on a unicorn times speed of light in furlongs per >>>> fortnight) >>>> for DVCS. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
