I would recommend reading through all of the Order-related code & signals. grep/ack your way through the codebase for any mention of Order and see what you find. That is, in my opinion, the best way to ensure you know exactly how status is used and how it isn't, so you know what is safe to do and what isn't.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Hazzadous <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would have assumed the "Shipped" meant it is in the hands of the > delivery service, not that it has reached its destination. If > delivery status for some postage services is available as a nice API > I'd suggest some integration with these could be useful. > > On Sep 27, 10:32 am, fruits <[email protected]> wrote: > > Background: > > We need to add some functions to our Satchmo Store. Our logic will > > rely on the status of the order. So I want to make sure if Satchmo > > will change the status of the Order object automatically in any > > stage. > > > > More info: > > In our application, drivers will be able to interact with the website > > using an iPhone app. He can see orders of the store, and he can also > > change the status of an order. When he sets the order as "In Process", > > we assume he is shipping the order. And when he sets it as "Shipped", > > we assume the customer has got the product. I want to make sure > > Satchmo itself does not assign meanings to these statuses. > > > > I'm really not familiar with Satchmo. I was in charge of the Pinax > > part > > of the project before some members of the team left. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
