Hi,
On Mon, 02.11.2009 at 09:43:40 -0600, Chris Moffitt <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm open to ideas on improving the product models. However, I'm not > convinced we can do it in an easy way. So far there have been lots of folks > with ideas but so far there hasn't been many concrete examples. At Djangocon > 1 year ago (yes, the original Djangocon) we sketched out some ideas that > sounded good on paper but never made it past that stage. My point is, it's a > major undertaking and I'm not sure how successful it would be. If someone > has a good idea on how to make this happen, I'd encourage them to fork > satchmo in bitbucket and start putting some code in place. If a better mouse > trap emerges, I'll seriously consider it. I was already considering to get my hands dirty, but I think I could only make it as far as to getting all products catching the signal twice, instead of only mine, and as long as I don't understand why this happens, I'm really unconvinced that I'd be able to arrive at a working Satchmo after that (without listener hackery, that is). Not without serious help from someone who actually knows what he's doing... Kind regards, --Toni++ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
