Yes any new dependencies would only be required if you use Fedex. I will try to setup a fork for integrating and make sure to let people look at it before integrating it with trunk.
-Chris On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:28 PM, hynekcer <hy...@sdb.cz> wrote: > I fixed international characters for legacy method in collaboration > with user "Ionic Drive" in e-mail communication following the thread > groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users/browse_thread/thread/ > 86ea6bfeeae3955b/ . I did not published the solution becase he found > other bug caused by outdating Fedex code (no "time_in_transit") and he > did not want to continue. > I think the new interface would be better if you have time for it now. > > I would like if no new dependencies would be imported if Fedex is not > used. New packages would be of course included in automatic Quick > Start Installation but it would be possible a manual installation of > unmodified Satchmo without them. It is not as serious as deep > dependencies on livesettings etc. but nobody knows ahead. > Please send a link some day before you commit it to trunk. > > On 26 lis, 23:56, Chris Moffitt <ch...@moffitts.net> wrote: > > I recently had the need to go in and make some custom changes to Fedex. > In > > the process, I learned that Satchmo's current XML implementation is a bit > > old and needs to be updated. The current version works with the legacy > > Fedex servers but won't migrate cleanly to the newer and more up to date > > ones. > > > > After fiddling around with it for a while, I think we have two options > > going forward. > > > > 1. Modify the existing XML version to use the newer syntax and keep it > > mostly the same as the current implementation. > > 2. Migrate to a newer API version using SOAP. It looks like there have > been > > a few folks that have done this so I think the implementation effort is > > fairly limited but it would introduce new dependencies for the Fedex > > module, namely suds and python-fedex - > http://code.google.com/p/python-fedex/ > > > > Under the hood there aren't that many differences between SOAP and the > XML > > api but after trying to read the Fedex docs for a while, they are really > > pushing towards the SOAP approach. Having some work already in place for > > the Python-fedex module, I think it's good to leverage instead of > > recreating our own. > > > > As you can tell, I'm leaning towards jumping to option #2 but wanted some > > feedback from the group. Also, some folks have already started working on > > this integration so I'd appreciate any updates or code contribution to > make > > this easier. > > > > Interested in the group's input. > > > > -Chris > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Satchmo users" group. > To post to this group, send email to satchmo-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > satchmo-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to satchmo-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to satchmo-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
