I think this is a fantastic idea! The satchmo search is not so good and
very hard to customise. It is way faster and WAY better just to implement
Haystack.
I just did this on my latest project and it works very well. I am using the
default haystack views and the Woosh backend, which works fine for smaller
sites and is very easy to implement. The only satchmo-related thing you
need to do is deactivate its search urls once you have set up haystack the
way you want. I had set Haystack up with url(r'^haystack
include('haystack.urls')), and then swithed it to url(r'^search/',
include('haystack.urls')) when it was ready. To deactivate satchmo_search
simply:
from satchmo_utils.urlhelper import delete_named_urlpattern
delete_named_urlpattern(urlpatterns, 'satchmo_search')
... before the haystack search urlpattern.
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 04:11:30 UTC-4, Swaroop Shankar wrote:
>
> Hello All,
> I want to implement a search functionality in my project and is seriously
> thinking about using haystack. I am not sure if it will work well with
> satchmo or how to integrate haystac with satchmo. Do anyone have experience
> in integrating the haystack with satchmo? If so could you please provide
> some details on how to do it.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Swaroop Shankar V
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Satchmo users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/satchmo-users/-/80GgkCw_uccJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
