I would really like to understand the migration decision. We almost lost a volunteer because of this opacity.
We now know Savannah|Savane is well maintained and not unsecure. Is the decision to migrate maintained considering this? Also, should the Savannah hackers be involved in this kind of decision?
-- Sylvain
PS: Richard, I wish you a full recovery for your imminent speech in France
On 2004.04.11 04:34, Richard Stallman wrote:
I'd like people to understand that we are not still considering the question. It is a final decision to switch to Gforge.
I will give a brief explanation. We cannot continue using the Savannah software because we have no one to maintain it properly. GForge is maintained seriously. Therefore we will switch to GForge.
I don't have time to discuss this further. I am in the hospital and falling behind on my other work.
_______________________________________________ Savane-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/savane-dev
