> In my opinion and in the opinion of CERN, the tracker is the most > interesting feature in Savane. This was why Savane was chosen by CERN > over SourceForge, Bugzilla and GForge by CERN. This is the most used > feature at CERN - where the mail interface would be a plus but is not > the main issue. > So it's logical to improve that part of Savane. > > We could make binding over another bug tracking system - but what > would be the point in using Savane, so?
Well, what about managing projects (in the webui and in the system), mailing lists, etc? Hmmm, I guest I just gotta make a comparison of RT, Buzilla, Gnats, GForge, Savane, and only then open my mouth regarding tracker issues. -- Sylvain _______________________________________________ Savane-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/savane-dev
