Follow-up Comment #2, bug #2839 (project savane):
> I'm not sure it really matter that this query form get the
> id 102.
>
> Would not it work if you replace 102 in
> update/1.0.8/voting-system.sql by an
> unused number?
Well, you're the author of this code, aren't you? :)
> BTW, strangely enough, there are at least one project using
> a non standard query form and there was no issue to get the
> voting system in place.
Interesting, what is the first non-default query-form ID, at Gna! ?
The code in editqueryforms.php doesn't seem to generate the ID itself,
delegating that task to MySQL, so I should have used #102 at first glance.
> Maybe we should use 99 as id for this query form, it would
> avoid the issue; we have to check first whether it would not
> implies that this field get shown in first place (that would
> not be nice).
I never understood why every ID starts at 100. Do you know about this?
Also I don't think reserving a fixed set of IDs is a good solution.
Adding a new query form in a generic way would better be done using a Perl or
PHP script.
I have no clue about the order issue. I guess it takes whatever order MySQL
uses, which may be sorted by ID by default. Adding an index may be the way to
cleanly fix this if that's needed.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=2839>
_______________________________________________
Message posté via/par Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Savane-dev mailing list
Savane-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/savane-dev
