On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:34:10PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota : > > >> > Is there a reason for using dimensions 60*7? And should we implement a > >> > way for admins to change this default value (other than editing the > >> > SQL tables directly)? > >> > >> I think we should provide sensible values from the start. Site admin > >> configuration is dense enough I'am afraid. > >> I would be happy if there was more rows in the description field. But > >> the width should not be changed. 78 characters for a line is maximum > >> but 60 seems to be safe solution to avoid the box being larger than > >> the part of the page its stands. If someone got a too small box, he's > >> likely to have a very specific font size configuration on his browser. > > > > Ok, though for the record, a width of 82 just fits right in the page > > with Mozilla Firefox in my old 800*600 laptop. > > Max is 78, as most terminal are 80. > > (On all the computers I use, from 1600x1200 to 1024x768, from 21" to > 13,5", 60 is more than usable).
I didn't remember about terminal compatibility (shame on me). Good. -- Sylvain
