This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: Savane.

/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #685] Latest Modifications:

Changes by: 
                Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
'Date: 
                mer 08.09.2004 à 12:18 (Europe/Paris)

            What     | Removed                   | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Planned Release |                           | DEV_2004-09-06_CERN


------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Ok, after discussion, it seems that the best solution is to maintain the links 
even if the action is not doable: the user will get there an information 
message, as long as needed. 
Plus such links will be lowlighted in a specific manner so users can easily 
understand they do not have access to this action.
This behavior should be standard.

It does not mean we have to print every action link possible everywhere: it 
means we have to print every action link that could reasonnably be available to 
a lambda user (no need to print the Administration bar to non-member, non-admin 
or not-logged in, for instance... -- but posting item should be)






/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #685] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=685>
Project: Savane
Submitted by: Mathieu Roy
On: mer 08.09.2004 à 11:52

Category:  Web Frontend
Severity:  1 - Trivial
Priority:  A - Later
Resolution:  None
Privacy:  Public
Assigned to:  None
Status:  Open
Release:  >= DEV_2004-09-06_CERN
Planned Release:  DEV_2004-09-06_CERN


Summary:  Knowing posting restriction in effect

Original Submission:  There's should be a standardize way to inform users of 
their rights/restrictions on the trackers they browse.

For instance, an anonymous users should be warned that he cant post on the 
XYZ's bug tracker because he's not logged in, or on TYU's task tracker because 
he's not member. 
I think it could make sense to put that information in the menu, first section.

Commentaires
------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: mer 08.09.2004 à 12:18        By: Mathieu Roy <yeupou>
Ok, after discussion, it seems that the best solution is to maintain the links 
even if the action is not doable: the user will get there an information 
message, as long as needed. 
Plus such links will be lowlighted in a specific manner so users can easily 
understand they do not have access to this action.
This behavior should be standard.

It does not mean we have to print every action link possible everywhere: it 
means we have to print every action link that could reasonnably be available to 
a lambda user (no need to print the Administration bar to non-member, non-admin 
or not-logged in, for instance... -- but posting item should be)












For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=685>

_______________________________________________
  Message posté via/par Gna!
  http://gna.org/


Reply via email to