This mail is an automated notification from the task tracker of the project: Savane.
/**************************************************************************/ [task #783] Full Item Snapshot: URL: <http://gna.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=783> Project: Savane Submitted by: Mathieu Roy On: jeu 23.09.2004 à 16:27 Should Start On: jeu 23.09.2004 à 00:00 Should be Finished on: lun 01.11.2004 à 00:00 Category: Packaging Priority: 3 - Normal Resolution: None Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Percent Complete: 0% Status: Open Effort: 0.00 Planned Release: Summary: Choice between "Groups" and "Projects" Original Submission: In Savane, currently many pages refers alternatively to "Groups" or "Project", to name exactly the name thing. We should decide the one we want to keep. - Project: More strict sense than Group, that may be unappropriate in some cases (some Group we have at Gna cannot really be called project in a sensible way, like most organizational groups). Alberto Aimar, leader of LCG/SPI Savannah, is in favor of this option. - Group: maybe a bit vague (which is both an advantage and an inconvenience). It has one clear advantages, many pages, scripts are named with the string "group", most of functions in Savane use the string group. I'm personally in favor of this option, but I wont oppose to the other option. I'd to hear your opinions, if any. For detailed info, follow this link: <http://gna.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=783> _______________________________________________ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/
