Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota : > The change is not very hard (attached). I used the field description: > "Email address of the person who submitted the item (if different from > the submitter field, add address to CC list)" - so I did not made the > checkbox I mentioned (of course, this is not because such a feature is > tedious to implement). If it ok I will commit it. > > However, I do have to test whether the user did not fake the form: he > could use a custom form to set the originator mail field. I could also > set the "assigned to" field using this method. I think we should add > this check for all fields when creating the tracker item.
Hum, users asked to be specifically able to have preformatted entries. For instance, some software include in their interface a link to their bug tracker prefilling some fields (like system or whatever). I think it is safe and handy ; in the case of the email adress, we'll still have the risk of spamming people. I think that I remember know why we decided not to link the originator email to notification :) In fact, the point was : if someone wants to be notified, he has to create an account. He can leave his address if he wants but that's not the preferred way - if we allow non logged in user to generate CC, we allow spam in some way. So the point is now: how comes that even I forgot about that. I should definitely be wrote down and explained to users. What is the content of the infobubble of the field? -- Mathieu Roy +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ | | Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ | | Not a native english speaker: | | http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
