Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
Hi Mathieu ,
> site-specific-content is provided as example, nothing more. It is
> up to people that run Savane on their server to choose which
> license they want to include.
OK, anyway i think it could be good to include the CCL but as you
recommended in the next paragraphm i'll send a mail to the email
address you wrote.
I think Mathieu said this file was in public domain, so people writing
Savane configuration files are not bound by any license.
I think its not needed to enlarge Gna! because there are special
organizations that are supporting the Free Knowledge , please have
a look at http.//www.ourproject.org .
But i must know if Gna! accepts the CC licenses.
CC licenses can be about anything, because they are made for different
kinds of work. Therefore, most CC licenses are not Free Software
licenses and cannot be accepted for software.
Mentioning CC licenses in the context of software development in not a
good thing IMHO, since we already have efficient licenses for software
and software documentation.
--
Sylvain
