Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota : > On Friday 09 Apr 2004 20:11, Mathieu Roy wrote: >> "Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota : >> > Hi, >> > >> >> This is very good news, this thing *had* to be done, thanks for doing >> >> that grunt work ! :). >> > >> > Good enough to discard the idea of migrating from Savane to GForge ? >> > >> > :) >> >> Since no reason to switch Savannah to GForge has ever been mentioned >> publicly (unless I missed it; if so, be kind and give me an url), it >> is hard to say. > > The reason is apparently "Savane cannot be made secure enough."
Apparently. But, as I said, "no reason [...] has ever been mentioned publicly". Looks like SCO claiming that source code has been stolen. Unless you have an explicit statement, you cannot do anything against that claim. Unless a public claim about Savane security is made, I will not consider that reason seriously -- because there is no reason to do otherwise. And if such a claim is made, I expect it to come with serious arguments, strong enough to justify the desire to spend time to trash the tool instead of fixing it. In the meantime, the statement "Savane cannot be made secure enough" is just totally meaningless. Some people call that FUD, and reasons that could lead people to spread such FUD remains to be analysed. Regards, -- Mathieu Roy +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ | | Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ | | Not a native english speaker: | | http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
