??changed: -The real issue is when the PHP License, which is meant for the PHP programming language only, is used for other works. A notable amont of such works come from the PEAR libraries (http://pear.php.net/). The real issue is when the PHP License, which is meant for the PHP programming language only, is used for other works. Many such works come from the PEAR libraries (http://pear.php.net/).
--removed: - ??changed: -Attemping to reason the FAQ maintainer failed: Attemping to reason with the FAQ maintainer failed: ??changed: - -An interesting question at the time was to know whether the GNU GPL v3 would be compatible, or not. After some talk with [email protected], it appears that the latest draft isn't compatible with the PHP License, and is not moving in that direction. (<<not that Section 7(e) is meant to be read *very* literally -- i.e., compatible clauses should say something like "This license does not grant you permission to use our trademarks." Anything that goes beyond that is almost certainly not acceptable because it won't account for things like fair use of the trademark, etc.>> --brett). - An interesting question at the time was to know whether the GNU GPL v3 would be compatible, or not. After some talk with [email protected], it appears that the latest draft isn't compatible with the PHP License, and is not moving in that direction. (<<Section 7(e) is meant to be read *very* literally -- i.e., compatible clauses should say something like "This license does not grant you permission to use our trademarks." Anything that goes beyond that is almost certainly not acceptable because it won't account for things like fair use of the trademark, etc.>> --brett). --removed: - --removed: - -- forwarded from https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/phpissues#msg20081222214157+0...@https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance _______________________________________________ Savannah-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-cvs
