-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Laurent Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This being said since we have little bugs on Savannah it is perfectly > possible to de-activate the Priority field if a majority of the team > members agree to do so. I still think it is a good practice to > decorrelate the impact information from the timing information. I agree with your definition of severity vs. priority, and I also think that we should leave it there. I use GNATS for a problem tracking system at work, and I have seen people getting confused sometimes, but after a brief explanation, it makes sense to them and start using it properly. Greetings, - -- Hugo Gayosso Support Free Software Support the GNU Project http://www.gnu.org http://www.gnu-friends.org/~hugo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE80KLZMNObVRBZveYRAiwqAJ0Q0sgbmCZ8dn8pNBzda6uNpYp01wCeMAFj BmbMTthrLArvr1isZ3/5Sp4= =ABSY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
