Ok, thanks a lot. -- Sylvain
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 01:39:44PM -0500, Joshua Ginsberg via RT wrote: > > You didn't check the URL :/ > > Yes I did... checking again... > > Oh... didn't realize how far down I had to scroll to see the continuing > discussion... :-/ I would have guessed that the discussion would all > take place in one part of the page, not two separate parts... Looking now... > > It all runs with the same timestamp and msg id's until it gets handed > off to cox's mailservers.... looking at the maillogs... Cox's mail > servers are not following SMTP... they're not providing a 220 to state > that the message was accepted for delivery.... the smtp connections time > out, and lists' mail server tries again... it appears they got this fixed... > > So this was a temporary Cox issue it seems... if this problem persists, > please let me know and I'll test further...
