On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 09:42:04PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 07:30:14PM +0100, Tim Dobson wrote: > > though it's now > > clear to me the reasons why this policy is in place. > > The policy is in plase because someone from the Webmasters must check > (at least initially) that the group meets our criteria. Only 5-10% of > all groups get listed, unfortunately. So such a check is not just a > matter of bureaucracy; it is common knowledge that you can't reliably > check your stuff. Someone else can. That's why code reviews/audits are > a good thing. > > > I have submitted the details to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is another reason for the procedure to be in place -- it first gets > processed by the FSF people, who record the group no matter what happens > next (for the not-so-new wiki-style human resources page; I can't > remember the URL), and then they move the ticket to webmasters. > > > Sorry for the confusion, > > No problem. I'm sorry for being harsh, but someone has to be the bad > guy :-}
Thanks for checking Yavor :) Do you think we should remove the Savannah account and resources meanwhile? I guess it depends on how likely DFEY-NW is to be listed. -- Sylvain
