Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > I don't know who this mail is adressed to, but anyway:
To webmasters + Savannah hackers. > 1) People may attach a webpage to the registration or to e-mails > before they are uploaded at nongnu.org I thought of that too, but in case like this it means that the requirement to be listed at /gnu/gnu-user-groups.html should be dropped. Or, alternatively, if it is attached to the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], webmasters can approve it and ask the OP about the task number where someone can ACK that the group has been approved (but not listed yet as there is no page online). > 2) The "webpage" requirement looks like a way to discuss with the GUG > owner about what they emphasize, what they spread the word about. The > requirement could be worded differently to include other ways to check > the ideals of that GUG, but webpages are a pretty good way to see what > ideas the GUG will make public. This is something to think about. > Also, in the facts, is there many GUG that do not wish to publish > any webpage about them? Yes, there are several groups that have Google/Yahoo group only which is AFAIU an interface to a newsgroup. What to do now? According to the current rules, the "ocelote" Savannah project cannot be approved, and webmasters cannot list the Ocelote GUG as there is no webpage.
