-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 February 10th 2010 for [email protected] copy to [email protected] thread "Explanation about permissive licences?".
>(Is some savannah applicant doing this complicated >multiple-licenses-in-a-file stuff?) Not currently, but in the near future I wish to adapt a small RBSD library as a part of a larger project. I would prefer to release my changes under the GPL. That project, if developed, will be sumitted to savannah. >Of course, the simplest (and best) general approach is to keep each >file under a single license, and if work is done under a different >license, put it in a different file. That's what we always try to do >in GNU. Yeah, thanks by advice, or maybe I put the markers between GPL and RBSD code. Why GNU don't mix licences in the same file?, Is some another problem for not do so? Thanks and excuse for my delayed respose karl, I was too busy before this. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREIAAYFAktzkMEACgkQZ4DA0TLic4ha7gCfXWTh2D9VMJhJa7LPfz2volpE wU0AniVTEx2XvCesF1TUVUjhmDHd3l8X =iTN9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
