Andrew Ferguson's message <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2016-04/msg00011.html> talks about Savannah being "A", but not "A+".
So I looked at the criteria: http://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria.en.html I have to say I think the A+ items are pretty reasonable. Aside from the W3C stuff, we should be able to implement the others. In our copious spare time and especially given the scads of active new (and old) volunteers :). Anyway ... k
