On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:29:36PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > I'm not asking for _authenticated_ HTTPS support, just anonymous access > over HTTPS. More straightforwardly, I'm looking for HTTPS as an > alternative to our current HTTP support, not an alternative to our > current SSH support.
I'd like to clarify what I meant by "authenticated", just in case anyone was confused. I'm only interested in using HTTPS to authenticate the server to the client. It's possible to do it the other way around, but I don't think it's necessary since anyone can use SSH. So, I concur with Paul.
