On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:21:01PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > It is a documentation project that wants to translate a manual to > spanish. > > The original manual is under the Creative Commons > Attribution-ShareAlike license. > > We should have criteria for documentation licenses on Savannah > just as we have criteria for software licenses. > I think we should call for documentation licenses to be compatible > with the GFDL or the GPL.
Am I correct if I say the GNU hasn't got a list like that yet? > Could you ask them to consider using the GFDL? Yes I could, but he said in het submition: "There is currently no work done, and AFAICS the translated documentation would also have to fall under the same license." The original document is under the Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike license. I do not know what I should answer if he asks if this is "legal": distributing the translation under a different license. I could not make it up from your response :) Thanks in advance, -- Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web page http://www.webworm.org GNU/Linux for schools http://www.nongnu.org/glms Savannah hacker http://savannah.gnu.org _______________________________________________ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
