Hi Karl, GNU Savannah being, in a way, part of the GNU project, wouldn't it make sense to put efforts in supporting GNU Arch first?
You know, "It means that the developers agree to pay attention to making the program work well with the rest of the GNU system--and conversely that the GNU project will encourage other GNU maintainers to pay attention to making their programs fit in well with it." Or is that unrelated? -- Sylvain On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 06:52:19PM -0400, Michael J. Flickinger wrote: > We were looking in to supporting GNU Arch on Savannah, though right now it's > certainly on the back burner and its exact implementation still would have to > be figured out. > > The idea of supporting subversion has come up before. Idealy, it would be > fantastic to have both subversions, cvs, and GNU Arch available on Savannah. > Subversions would be easier to implement on Savannah than Arch, but for now > there are no formalized plans to support either of the versioning systems. > > > On Wednesday 18 May 2005 06:15 pm, Karl Berry wrote: > > I recently heard a rumour that you were working on adding GNU Arch > > support to savannah. Is that true, and if so, is it set in stone? > > > > FWIW, I personally would find subversion support far more useful for > > maintaining my GNU packages. Based on discussions with other GNU > > maintainers, I don't think I am alone, either. > > > > Just thought I'd mention it, no particular reply needed :). > > > > Happy hacking, > > karl > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Savannah-help-public mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers > > -- > Michael J. Flickinger > > > _______________________________________________ > Savannah-help-public mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers _______________________________________________ Savannah-help-public mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
