Hi, We current have 3 feature requests about log_accum:
* https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailitem&item_id=104373 It's a bug I recently seen mentioned in an old archive, so it must be around for long, related to diff during branching. * https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailitem&item_id=104562 https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailitem&item_id=104200 Requests for more diff options (-N and -wB) If you try to unify log_accum, you might want to have a look at previous Savannah Hacker Vincent Caron's work called cvsreport, who I think rewrote a similar system from scratch. https://gna.org/p/cvsreport -- Sylvain On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 01:27:13PM -0400, Derek Price wrote: > Savannah's log_accum appears to have diverged significantly from the > version in CVS. I imported your change anyhow, as well as updating the > previously broken CVS log_accum (some cvshome.org specific changes had > been accidentally imported) to accept email addresses on the command > line again, as Savannah's does. > > I think CVS's log accum currently has fewer bugs than Savannah's in > regards to generating diffs. It would be interesting to hear what other > features the Savannah-hackers thought it lacked. > > Thanks, > > Derek > > > Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > >The closest I can find for this specific change is the following commit: > >"Apply Paul Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> patch" > >http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/administration/administration/savannah/backend/gnu-specific/log_accum.pl.diff?r1=1.20&r2=1.21 > > > > > >On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 06:45:11PM -0400, Richard M. Stallman wrote: > > > > > >>The version of log_accum running on Savannah includes some changes > >>that implement a new option to specify a branch. > >> > >>Would you please send Derek Price the current version now > >>running on Savannah? _______________________________________________ Savannah-help-public mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
