Follow-up Comment #4, sr #104562 (project administration):
I am not arguing against unified diffs. I am actually arguing for `cvs diff
-uN', as I prefer unified diffs as well. This causes contents to be
generated for new and removed diffs, rather than a one line "filex was added"
or whatever it is. Thus the entire commit can be reviewed via the email.
If diffs were generated with -N, commit emails could also be passed whole
cloth to patch to recreate the commit in a workspace based just prior to the
commit, including new and removed files.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailitem&item_id=104562>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Savannah-help-public mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
