Follow-up Comment #9, sr#111026 (group administration):
[comment #8 comment #8:] > [comment #7 comment #7:] > > The AGPL itself does not require this kind of notice, as far as I can tell, > > The AGPL requires that the program in question prominently offer every its user the corresponding source code; I believe the current implementation complies with that, and rms has confirmed it does. It does absolutely does NOT require that. And RMS would never in a hundred years "confirm" what you claim above. There is literally no network communication involved with sv_membersh, there is NO interaction from the user with sv_membersh. The notice is NOT required. > It doesn't seem helpful to me to say, 'we needn't do it this way'---not without explaining, 'we can do it such or such way instead'. It has been explained to you on multiple occasions to you over the course of a year since you broke the workflow for everyone. This currently makes it IMPOSSIBLE to work on anything Savannah related. Please stop this nonsense, it is again the stupid "10-lines copyright" obtuseness. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?111026> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/