Follow-up Comment #2, sr #111331 (group administration): At 2025-10-29T13:30:34-0400, Ineiev wrote: > You can mark the bugs as spam, and they'll be hidden by default. > > Currently, notifications of anonymous posts and posts of new users are > sent to sv-hackers-private@; their volume is low enough for me to just > look through them and mark spam in the Web UI. Spam is relatively > rare as far as I can tell, thank the dog. And generally, encrypted > spam should make less sense because it can only be read by the > addressees.
I don't think this message was spam in the "unsolicited commercial
email" sense. Given the blatant error involving confusion of maintainer
identity--why address the message verbally to Bertrand but use _my_ GPG
key?--I suspect some kind of robotic probe, some sort of {f,ph}ishing.
I am therefore uncertain if we want to categorize this as "spam" or not.
Whatever it was, it was non-actionable. The submitter was not signed
into Savannah when submitting and offered no contact information. If
they really do have a security vulnerability to report, they offered me
no avenue for obtaining its description.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?111331>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
