Follow-up Comment #6, task #4109 (project administration):
Hi,
Answering your questions:
> Should the copyright holder be FSF at this time, or only after
> acceptance of the project?
You are not part of the GNU project, and when you submitted your
project at Savannah you selected to be part of non-GNU projects, this
means that you project will be hosted in Savannah, but will not be
part of the GNU project. If you want to be part of the GNU project you
must contact the GNU Eval Team.
> What do you recommend to use for copyright years when the file
> modification history has not been recorded? Best guesses?
As you can read in the document that I pointed you in my last email:
`The list of year numbers should include each year in which you
finished preparing a version which was actually released, and which
was an ancestor of the current version.'
A list of years when you "finished preparing a version", not when you
modified the file, if you even cannot remember these years, you can
start to license your project since the current year or the last one
when you released a new version of your project.
> In the license notice in each file should I call the software "GNU
> experix" at this time, or only after acceptance?
As I wrote in my first answer, you are not part of the GNU project, so
you shouldn't use the "GNU experix" name until you contact the GNU
Eval Team and they will evaluate your project and then told answer you
if you are part of the GNU project tor not.
Regards,
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=4109>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
