Follow-up Comment #2, task #4411 (project administration): I understand that the FSF would like everyone to move to GPL3 when its available, but I don't feel comfortable releasing code under a license I haven't had a chance to actually read. Infact, I think I would be negligent; not that I don't trust the FSF to publish a fair license, but to have not read the license under which my code could potentially be released. I'm the sole copyright holder over giFTstep (AppController.h & .m were autogenerated by ProjectCenter, a gnustep IDE, which initially marked all files with copyright assignment to the FSF). With 1 copyright holder, won't it be trivial to allow GPL2+GPL3 licensing when GPL3 is published? Is GPL3 going to require the "or any later version" part?
I intend to use savannah as my primary development, but I would like to have sourceforge as a backup as well. Am I really not allowed to house the source on both sites? I intend to use savannah as my primary development site for this project. I have updated the tarball. http://thuhfreak.isa-geek.com/giFTstep.tar.bz2 I now have the COPYING file (verbatim from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt), and proper copyright notices on all my source files (with the FSF address change). _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=4411> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
