Follow-up Comment #2, task #5214 (project administration): Thanks for the feedback. I have two questions about the documentation licenses.
1. I know that Debian does not consider the GFDL a free license due to an invariant sections clause (see http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/ddp-policy/ch-common.en.html). Therefore I'd like to avoid the GFDL. (Did I mention that driconf is already included in Debian?) Debian recommends the GPL for software documentation. Would it be acceptable for you if I licensed the documentation of my project under the GPL? 2. To which documentation files should I add license statements? - the current README file (definitely) - the README file that states the licenses for png images (probably not) - the CHANGELOG and TODO list? (not sure) Regards, Felix _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=5214> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
