Maybe avoid confusing sv-problem-without-source-code and sv-problem-tarball...
Maybe sv-approve-without-source-code was a better name actually? ;) -- Sylvain On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 09:51:51AM +0000, Frouin Jean-Michel wrote: > > Update of task #7424 (project administration): > > Status: None => Wait reply > Assigned to: None => snoogie > > _______________________________________________________ > > Follow-up Comment #1: > > Hi, > > Your projects meets the Savannah requirements, except that we cannot review > your source code yet. > > We prefer to approve project with source code, so we can check it for legal > issues (even non-functional code is OK). We will among others check if the > source files contain appropriate copyright notice and permission-to-copy > statements at the beginning of every copyrightable file. Our review helps > catch potential legal issues early. > > If you need Savannah right now, please explain to us why; otherwise, please > resubmit the project when you have source code. > > If we approve your project without source code, we will review the code in > the near future (or better, at your request). If then the source code does not > meet our requirements (for example, non-free dependencies), we will then > discuss the issue and possibly remove the project from Savannah. > > > Do you need the Savannah services now, and if yes do you agree with the above > conditions? > > Regards, > Jean-Michel > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?7424> > > _______________________________________________ > Message posté via/par Savannah > http://savannah.gnu.org/ > > >
