Follow-up Comment #2, task #7859 (project administration):
(posted by mail)
> OpenCDK (GPL) has traditionally been included in the
> GPL'ed parts of GnuTLS, but Nikos wanted to move this to
> the LGPL parts of GnuTLS instead. He talked to RMS about
> this, and after some long discussions and as far as I
> understand, it was agreed that it is OK to re-license only
> the minimal part of OpenCDK that we need in GnuTLS. These
> minimal parts is what will be in opencdk-lite.
>
> Timo has assigned the copyright to the FSF under a GnuTLS
> assignment, see fencepost.
>
> See also:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2008-03/msg00037.html
>
> I wasn't directly involved in the re-licensing
> discussions, so I just trust what Nikos said in that
> mailing list post. It may be useful to ask Nikos and/or
> RMS about this if you want an official decision.
Ack.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?7859>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
