If the only problem is the missing "<version> or later", I think we can approve the project.
-- Sylvain On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:39:52PM +0200, Sebastian Gerhardt wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for pointing this out. > Does this mean we can approve the project right away or > do we ask the maintainer to choose and put in a "conventional" > license notice? > > > > > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 22:27 +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > I thought I'd note that the GPL says: > > > > "If the Program does not specify a version number of the GNU General > > Public License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free > > Software Foundation." > > > > So at first glance it's not necessary to precise the version if no > > version is specified.
