It looks like I emailed my first reply to an invalid address without realizing it. See the quoted text below for more context to these comments. Thanks!
I compiled IcedTea 1.6.1 and my test suite passed under it. For reference, the Fedora openjdk package seems to be IcedTea. Here's the output of java -version from the IcedTea 1.6.1 that I compiled today: [phigg...@chop linux-i586]$ ./bin/java -version java version "1.6.0_0" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.6.1) (build 1.6.0_0-b16) OpenJDK Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) Here's the output from the Fedora version: [phigg...@chop linux-i586]$ /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/bin/java -version java version "1.6.0_0" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.6) (fedora-29.b16.fc11-i386) OpenJDK Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) It looks like I could have saved myself a 4+ hour compile if I'd known that. :-) I've put copyright and license notices on all my .vlad and ruby files. I can upload a new tar file for review. Thanks, Patrick 2009/11/6 Patrick Higgins <[email protected]>: > I have done all my development and testing on the OpenJDK that comes > with Fedora Core 11 (full version is > java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-29.b16.fc11.i586). > > In looking at the downloads on the IcedTea website (specifically > http://icedtea.classpath.org/download/fedora/), it's not clear to me > how different IcedTea and OpenJDK are, since the version I am running > appears to be downloadable from the IcedTea site. > > I'm going to try building IcedTea and I'll let you know how it goes. > > I cannot put a copyright notice inside every file because not all of > them allow comments (.expect and .tokens definitely do not). I'll see > if I've missed any that do allow comments. The .vlad files will allow > them, but most of them are test files which would be harder to > maintain with the full copyright header in them. Is it acceptable to > just put two lines saying that I own the copyright and that it is > licensed under the LGPL v2.1 or (at your option) any later version? > > I am licensing this project under LGPL v2.1 or later. Was it just a > mistake when you suggested v3 or later? > > Thanks for the help. > > --Patrick > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Follow-up Comment #1, task #9873 (project administration): >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> November 5th in Savannah item #9873: "Submission of VladNput" >> >> You must determine whether your project can run on a Free Software >> Java suite (see https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/JavaIssues and >> http://www.gnu.org/software/java/ for more information). It is >> mandatory to run on a fully free platform to be hosted in Savannah. >> >> We recommend you to test your project using IcedTea, or GCJ + GNU >> Classpath, and ensure that your Java code runs on this Free Software >> Java suite. >> >> IceTea is based on Sun's OpenJDK and uses free replacements for its >> proprietary parts. GCJ is the GNU Compiler for Java, part of the GCC >> (GNU Compiler Collection). The Classpath project aims to develop a >> free and portable implementation of the Java API (the classes in the >> 'java' package). >> >> More information is available at http://icedtea.classpath.org/, >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ and http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/. >> >> Please provide us with more information about this point. >> >> Also, plese put and update (To LGPL 3 "or any later") the appropiate >> licence notiches on all files. A lot of files (*.expect, *.tokens, >> *.vlad, etc...) lacks Copyrigth information. >> >> Note that I am not a member of the Savannah administration team. I >> only try to help you to fix the remaining issues in this project >> submission that I could find. If all hosting requirements for Savannah >> are met, an administrator will approve this submission. >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAkrzfgMACgkQZ4DA0TLic4gNzQCcDVuH/IBAWQ90RfJB5MkBUnoc >> 7rAAnjZP7COLjsez6laBhNamPPdUUdJV >> =mkhb >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> _______________________________________________________ >> >> Reply to this item at: >> >> <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9873> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Message sent via/by Savannah >> http://savannah.gnu.org/ >> >> > > > > -- > Patrick Higgins > Brazen Systems > (303)819-6253 > [email protected] > -- Patrick Higgins Brazen Systems (303)819-6253 [email protected]
