Follow-up Comment #4, task #9944 (project administration): I updated again http://savannah.gnu.org/submissions_uploads/argile-1.0.0.tar.gz
I added copyright and GNU FDL notices at the end of long documentation files, but not for small documentation files (they are listed in README anyway) I added doc/COPYING from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.txt I updated AUTHORS and README files Do I need to specify "(see the AUTHORS file distributed along with this software)" everywhere ? or is "the Argile authors" sufficient ? (some files do not have this precision in their copyright notices as it seemed pedantic) I also changed the license of the runtime library from zlib to LGPL rather than GPL because I think that forcing GPLization of programs written in this language could scare a lot of programmers away (it is a new programming language, and no other compiler for it exist yet). However, I am open to suggestions. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9944> _______________________________________________ Message posté via/par Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
