Follow-up Comment #8, task #10258 (project administration): Hi, I made the changes to that file you demanded, which you can see at the beginning of
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/favir/file/83109fe9619d/favir/inst/drafts/BasicReserving.Rnw The GFDL is also checked into that repository. I've been trying to educate myself on documentation licenses and I still disagree with you however. According to your logic, it seems all of latex would also have to be under the GFDL because it only serves to generate PDF output. Also after reading the GFDL it doesn't seem appropriate for short papers---if someone wants to give out 3 pages of a GFDL licensed paper, they also have to print out the full nine page GFDL! The creative commons ShareAlike license seems much better, and I can see why wikipedia and other websites have switched to it from the GFDL. So to sum things up, I don't like the GFDL and being forced to use it is a bummer. I may not agree with you, but you are the boss, and I'm a fan of Savannah and am grateful that you and the other Savannah administrators donate your time even when you make bad decisions. So, please don't delete my project. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10258> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
