Follow-up Comment #9, task #9475 (project administration): I have already released my code under the GPL Version 2.0 with the STD C++ exception. Removing the words "All Rights Reserved" would have the same legal effect as keeping them. What is the legal argument for its omission if the words have no legal meaning (under the Berne convention)? Is it purely stylistic? Why threaten to delete a project unless cosmetic concerns are addressed within one week? I've complied but it seems extreme to me.
It would be better for the free software community if you spent your time with tasks other than burdening free software developers with mundane tasks, many of whom have very little free time to develop free software outside their busy research schedules. For example, your z130 code is poorly commented and has no regression tests, http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/z130.git/tree/tiger_cmp_generic.c . Without a regression test, there is no way for us to know whether it works given platform differences. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9475> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
