Follow-up Comment #2, task #11408 (project administration): There is no point to assign an independent copyright to the JAXB generated content, because it has been generated from http://esp.nongnu.org/esp.xsd.gz, which is already under GPL. I suppose the same files could be generated with the GNU Java toolchain (but I didn't verify that).
I do think the tar file is an established distribution standard. The jar file is merely an internal packaging that could be removed. My idea is to keep the source tree in a jar file and put the documentation directly into the tar file. Thus one could import the jar file as a project into Eclipse, for instance. I suppose you don't consider the reference to http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Open_Source_Ethics in the header of org/nongnu/frs/service/opentravel/OTAConnector.java a problem either? It raises, among other things, the question how reliable the code review of open and free software can be expected to be. I did try to start a project for code review and code signing (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/csca) once but there was apparently no interest in the topic. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?11408> _______________________________________________ Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
