Follow-up Comment #5, task #12519 (project administration): Hello Luis,
You will find the last version here : http://www.labri.fr/perso/boussica/savannah/mlv-1.1.1.tar.gz All should be ok. I prefer to put the licences inside a COPYRIGHT file instead of a README file. Is it ok ? Here an abstract of the modifications : * example/advanced/ All *.png, *.ogg have a creative common or a gpl licence. I have created a COPYRIGHT file instead of a README file to describe all the licences present in the directory. I use now flower.jpg with a creative common licence instead of ub1.jpg and upe_mlv.png * packaging/windows/cross-compilation/external_libraries/* IDEM, except that, i have added a GPL licence header for libSDL_mixer.la.in and libz.la.in (because i have modified that two files). * packaging/debian/debian/control.in ckaging/debian/debian/libmlv.symbols.in packaging/debian/debian/rules packaging/fedora/rpmbuild/SPECS/mlv.spec.in I have added a GPL licence inside each files. Regards, _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?12519> _______________________________________________ Message posté via/par Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
