Follow-up Comment #30, task #14667 (project administration): > Either they have a valid copyright and license notice or otherwise stated here: > > http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/gsequencer.git/tree/README?h=2.0.x#n50
Notes like "licensed under the terms of GNU GPLv3+" are not clear enough, could you use a form recommended <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html> by the GNU project? Some files like docs/images/ags_ffplayer.png still lack copyright notices, and the form of the "copyright notice" for the others is not valid, like "copyright provided by Stefan Sauer", please check what a copyright notice should look like <https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html>. (Note that the README file should be located in the same directory as the files whose notices it includes.) I'm sorry I have to cite these documents since you must had read them before you offered your package for the GNU project. > Just found 4 files without any: ... > But only this one is included in the tarball: Why are the 3 other included in VCS? Strictly speaking, you distribute them. Why do you make your repository technically undistributable? > http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/gsequencer.git/tree/ags_functional_notation_edit_test.xml?h=2.0.x > > It is a file produced by GSequencer and used by the unit-tests. > I think mention it in the README would be fine because the > application doesn't support adding license notes. I agree. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14667> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
